California's Eastern District federal court found that Prop 65's acrylamide warning requirement was likely unconstitutional and preliminarily enjoined new lawsuits alleging failure to warn for acrylamide exposure in food and beverages.

Proposed amendments to consumer products regulations would affect retailers and manufacturers of aerosol air fresheners, hair care products, fragrances and insecticides.

Businesses selling products in California that utilize short-form Proposition 65 warnings may have to be re-label yet again or risk enforcement actions.

In a courtroom, assertions must be analyzed in the context of tort law.

The industry should anticipate more lawsuits and investigations from attorneys general and local municipalities.

When attorney advertising is combined with misleading information or scare tactics, there is a significant risk of real harm to an unsuspecting public.

There are a number of creative ways for defendants to challenge master complaints in MDLs.

The revisions would significantly limit safe harbor provisions that protect against bounty hunters.